Search
Subscribe

Bookmark and Share

About this Blog

As enterprise supply chains and consumer demand chains have beome globalized, they continue to inefficiently share information “one-up/one-down”. Profound "bullwhip effects" in the chains cause managers to scramble with inventory shortages and consumers attempting to understand product recalls, especially food safety recalls. Add to this the increasing usage of personal mobile devices by managers and consumers seeking real-time information about products, materials and ingredient sources. The popularity of mobile devices with consumers is inexorably tugging at enterprise IT departments to shifting to apps and services. But both consumer and enterprise data is a proprietary asset that must be selectively shared to be efficiently shared.

About Steve Holcombe

Unless otherwise noted, all content on this company blog site is authored by Steve Holcombe as President & CEO of Pardalis, Inc. More profile information: View Steve Holcombe's profile on LinkedIn

Follow @WholeChainCom™ at each of its online locations:

Entries in Cloud Computing (23)

Thursday
Feb192009

Microsoft Office Applications and Data Ownership - Part II

Return to Part I

The growing dominance of Microsoft's BizTalk Server offers an interesting - and very real - opportunity for accelerating the transformation of Microsoft Office Applications into SaaS-anized supply chain tools for small businesses (SMBs).

BizTalk is the leader in enterprise platform integration. Click on the thumbnail to the right to see an abridged version of the Magic Quadrant found in Magic Quadrant for Application Infrastructure for Back-End Application Integration Projects (Gartner, 19 Dec. 2008). This report is so favorable that Microsoft has licensed this publication for prominent display at Microsoft's BizTalk Server website.

Gartner says that Microsoft's leadership is directly tied to the current and forward-looking strengths of BizTalk:

  • Brand recognition, global reach, mind share and huge installed base of products that are leveraged for BizTalk Server sales.
  • BizTalk Server installed customer base of more than 8,000 enterprises — two-thirds are estimated to be BizTalk Server 2006 Enterprise Edition or newer.
  • BizTalk Server is an identified part of two of Microsoft’s largest and most aggressive initiatives: Microsoft’s Oslo technology [a data modeling platform] and Windows Azure Services Platform [a Cloud computing platform].

But Gartner also has cautionary comments:

  • Comprehensive, general-purpose metadata management (that is, business process models, component models, data models, applications, services and interface artifacts) will only become available incrementally as future versions of Microsoft’s Oslo technology and Windows Azure extend the capabilities that exist today in BizTalk.
  • Currently there are no products for managing and implementing policy and life cycle management integrated with BizTalk Server.

Let's take a look at the following high-altitude slides for better understanding what Gartner is talking about vis-a-vis 'life cycle management'. 

View Microsoft Office Applications and Data Ownership - Part II on Scribd

As mentioned in the slide show, integrating Pardalis' metadata business rules with BizTalk's business rules provides a head start for massively connecting 10's of millions (to say the least) of small businesses to BizTalk's enterprise business activity monitoring. The key is providing small businesses with life cycle, chain-of-custody managment of their own data products. Providing this kind of data ownership to small businesses is the path of least resistance to Ballmer's visions of integrating supply chain competitors.

Saturday
Nov082008

Economist: Let it rise

The following excerpts are from a special report on corporate IT printed in The Economist on October 25th:

In the beginning computers were human. Then they took the shape of metal boxes, filling entire rooms before becoming ever smaller and more widespread. Now they are evaporating altogether and becoming accessible from anywhere.

and

Information technology is turning into a global 'cloud' accessible from anywhere, says Ludwig Siegele [The Economist's technology correspondent]. What does that mean for the way people conduct business?

For the full written report, go to Let it rise: A special report on corporate IT.

For an accompanying audio interview of Siegle, in which he discusses how these tough economic times will likely mean faster adoption of the 'cloud' by corporate IT, click here.

Saturday
Nov012008

The Economist: Creating the cumulus

The following is an excerpt from an article published in the October 25th edition of The Economist:

The importance of this shift from a monolithic [software] product to [software as a service] is hard to overstate. In a sense, it has seeded the cloud, allowing the droplets - the services that make up the electronic vapour - to form. It will allow computing to expand in all directions and serve ever more users. The new architecture also helps the less technically minded to shape their own clouds ....

Just as for the industrialisation of data centres, there is a historic precedent for this shift in architecture: the invention of movable type in the 15th century. At the time, printing itself was not a new idea. But it was Gutenberg and his collaborators who thought up the technologies needed to make printing available on a mass scale, creating letters made of metal that could be quickly assembled and re-used.

For the complete article, go to Creating the cumulus: Software will be transformed into a combination of services.

Wednesday
Oct012008

The Economist: Know-alls (Data Mining)

The following excerpt is from The Economist article published 27 September 2008:

In November 2002 news reports revealed the existence of a big, secret Pentagon programme called Total Information Awareness. This aimed to identify suspicious patterns of behaviour by “data mining” (also known as “pattern recognition”): computer-driven searches of large quantities of electronic information. After a public outcry it was dubbed, perhaps more palatably, Terrorism Information Awareness. But protests continued, and in September 2003 Congress blocked its funding.

That, many people may have assumed, was that. But six of TIA’s seven components survived as secret stand-alone projects with classified funding. A report in February by America’s Department of Homeland Security named three programmes it operates to sniff out suspicious patterns in the transport of goods. Similar projects have mushroomed in, among other countries, Britain, China, France, Germany and Isreal ....

For the full ariticle, go to Know-alls (Data Mining).

Saturday
Sep272008

CNN: Got an idea to help the world? Here's $10 million

The following is the introduction to a CNN article published Wednesday, 24 September 2008:

Got an idea that could change the world, or at least help a lot of people? Google wants to hear from you -- and it will pay as much as $10 million to make your idea a reality.


To help celebrate its 10th birthday, the ambitious Internet giant is launching an initiative to solicit, and bankroll, fresh ideas that it believes could have broad and beneficial impact on people's lives.

Called Project 10^100 (pronounced "10 to the 100th"), Google's initiative will seek input from the public and a panel of judges in choosing up to five winning ideas, to be announced in February ....

For the complete article, go to Got an idea to help the world? Here's $10 million. I did and then I clicked over to Project "10 to the 100th" and submitted my idea. Below is the substance of my proposal. Hyperlinks were not permitted in the submission but I've nonetheless included a few in this blog entry. Also, the numbers 1 through 7 cover identification information, etc., and are not included below.

8. Your idea's name:

Banking on Information Ownership

9. Please select a category that best describes your idea.

[selected] Community: How can we help connect people, build communities and protect unique cultures?

10. What one sentence best describes your idea?

Empower people with data ownership similar to the trustworthy, granular control they have over depositing and spending their banked money.

11. Describe your idea in more depth.

People are comfortable and familiar with monetary banks. That’s a good thing because without people willingly depositing their money into banks, there would be no banking system as we know it. In order to make profits, banks bargain and pay with money and services for access to people’s money. Without a healthy monetary banking system our economies would be comparatively dysfunctional, and our personal lives would be critically deficient in opportunities.

Imagine the opportunities going unfulfilled because there is no similar information banking system arising in the Cloud. There is no similar integrated system existing for precisely and efficiently delivering our medical records to a new physician, or for providing access to a health history of the specific animal slaughtered for that purchased steak. Nothing out there compares with how the banking system facilitates gasoline purchases. While our monetary banking system granularly processes the exact amount of the checks we write, the tools currently being used by information technology companies would imprecisely and inefficiently ‘pay’ for your $35.62 tank of gas by cleaning out your entire bank account. Got $3,434.99 in your checking account? That’s what would be ‘paid’, and then it would be left up to the gas station to give you change for $3,399.37.

Wells Fargo formed in 1852 in response to the California gold rush. Wells Fargo wasn’t just a monetary bank, it was also an express delivery company of its time for transporting gold, mail and valuables across the Wild West. While we are now accustomed to next morning, overnight delivery between the coasts, Wells Fargo captured the imagination of the nation by connecting San Francisco and the East coast with its Pony Express.

Today’s Web needs information banks that do for the on-going gold rush on information what Wells Fargo did for the Forty-niners.

12. What problem or issue does your idea address?

The monetary banking system exhibits several key characteristics:

  • Security: A physically safe place to store money. Also, government regulations insure continuity of deposits when banks go bankrupt.
  • Credibility: Banks handle people’s money like they say they will in order to continue maintaining and attracting deposits.
  • Compensation: Again, In order to make profits, banks bargain and pay with money and convenient personal and Internet services for access to people’s money.
  • Control: Customers granularly deposit their money, withdraw it or transfer it when they choose.
  • Integration: Banks provide a critical component to a very complex web of communications involved in our everyday transactions. In the U.S., a strong central banking system, the Federal Reserve System, has been critical in that regard.
  • Verification: By regulation and by practice, banks verify that monies deposited with them are legal tender and not counterfeit.

Today’s Web needs information banks that do the same.

13. If your idea were to become a reality, who would benefit the most and how?

The old adage that ‘possession is nine-tenths of the law’ well applies to many fields like that of food safety, product tracking along complex supply chains, the tracking of people’s movements or Internet clicks, or the compilation of purchasing habits. But let’s take personal health records as a bell-weather example. Everyone - the hospitals, the doctors, the insurance companies, government agencies, consumer groups - claims to speak for the patients. But who really speaks for the ‘property-less’ patients? America is in the middle of a political stalemate vis-à-vis the efficient collection, storage and sharing of medical records. Ownership begets economic change which begets political voice. A national information banking system that granularly empowers patients with technological portability and control – not just HIPAA confidentiality protections - over their own medical information would provide an opportunity for firing the imagination of patients that brings real change.

14. What are the initial steps required to get this idea off the ground?

The initial steps are already being made. Patents are being globally secured. The first information bank is operating in North Dakota for the members of the CalfAID USDA PVP program. This is a member-trusted program that keeps verifiable pedigree information connected with animals as they make their way through a complex food supply chain that is highly dysfunctional when it comes to information sharing. The director of CalfAID recognizes that there are now two products being produced along agricultural supply chains (1) the traditional product, in this case an animal, and (2) an informational product. The bottom line: build to the Cloud from trusted institutions and groups. TRUST COMES FIRST, THEN COMES TECHNOLOGY BUILT FOR PRESERVING AND EMPOWERING THAT TRUST. Then, imagine further that the families of the members of the CalfAID program would have interest in using the same trusted technology for porting their personal health records.

15. Describe the optimal outcome should your idea be selected and successfully implemented. How would you measure it?

There would be several measuring sticks. For instance, measure the economic impact upon family farms who will now for the first time be compensated not just for their traditional farm products but also for their informational products. For instance, measure the political impact upon people’s lives when they finally are empowered with the choice of technological control over their information properties as they have long experienced over their monetary properties. For instance, measure the impact upon the emerging Semantic Web that without an adjacent informational banking infrastructure will have virtually no opportunity to bargain for access to information that people consider to be their identity, that participants to complex supply chains consider to be confidential and that governments classify as secret. Without such a new infrastructure, such trustworthy information will forever remain missing or incomplete.

16. [skipped]

17. [skipped]

18. If you'd like to recommend a specific organization, or the ideal type of organization, to execute your plan, please do so here.

Again, build to the Cloud from trusted institutions and groups.

[end]

That concludes my submission. If you are interested in more details, see also the April, 2007 Pardalis white paper entitled Banking on Granular Information Ownership. See also, Laying the First Plank of a Supply Chain Ownership Web in North Dakota.